Skip to interactive case
All demosFINANCE / 360

COUNTERFOLD / FRONTIER RESEARCH

Robots get cheaper.Your loan can lose more.

New deployment costs fall, while an already financed fleet can lose its collateral cushion. Two asset vintages, two effects.

Put the thesis to the testDated public research + calculated fictional cases. No connected AI, no buy or sell signal.
THE POINT OF TENSION€11.4m

collateral shortfall if the fleet is liquidated, before guarantee

A factTwo readingsEvidence to seek
Illustrative parameters · conditional conclusion

01 / ICARUS

What changes. And for whom.

All positions, values, terms and relationships below are fictional. The publications provide context, not these parameters.

New robot · cost per productive hour€10.42/hBefore decline: €13.19/h. Cost reduction: 21.1%.
Legacy fleet · collateral shortfall€11.4mConditional on liquidation, before guarantee. Neither expected nor realised loss.

Cost-parity threshold: 37.9% utilisation against the fictional €22/h benchmark.

Two asset vintages

Net resale before shock€56m
Remaining principal · 1,000 robots€45m
Net resale after shock€33.6m

Debt coverage : 74.7 %

CHALLENGE THE PROTECTION

Who stands behind the guarantor?

The manufacturer can face the same price shock. Testing a buyback does not establish its ability to pay.

€11.4m · shortfall after conditional protection
Inspect assumptions, formulas and boundaries

New hardware before shock €100,000; integration €20,000; economic life 5 years; annual running costs €14,000. Productive hours = 4,000 × utilisation × 90% task success. Cost/h = [(new price + 20,000)/5 + 14,000] / productive hours.

Separate legacy fleet: 1,000 units, €45,000 remaining principal/unit. Net resale = new price × 70% × 80% × 1,000. Linear price/resale transmission is an assumption, not an observation. No automatic default, default probability, operating cash flows, other security or recourse. Hourly cost excludes financing, tax and terminal value.

Conditional buyback: €50m net for the fleet if the guarantor pays. Recovery = max(net resale, buyback); they are not additive. Illustrative hourly reference: €22/h, with no demonstrated task equivalence.

02 / ERIDANOS × ARIADNE

A source. Not certainty.

29.09.2026
Download references

03 / SOLON × POLYDEUCES

The thesis must survive a counter-case.

Contributions calculated from current state, without an AI model call. An unknown becomes an evidence request, never a fact.

01

Research

At a 40% decline in new prices, simplified cost reaches €10.42/h and collateral shortfall €11.4m, before guarantee.

Preview to assemble
02

Counter-case

Resale need not track new prices. Availability, performance or a specialist secondary market can preserve the legacy model’s value.

Preview to assemble
03

Revision condition

The cushion disappears after a 19.64% decline under the resale assumption. A firm net bid of €45,000/unit would cover principal.

Preview to assemble

FROM SIGNAL TO SERVICE

What your business could offer.

Fleet financing with productive-hour monitoring, independent resale evidence and guarantor terms.

Authorised task data, amortisation, asset rights, secondary-market liquidity and borrower consent.

A hypothesis to validate, not a financing or insurance offer. Counterfold supplies decision support; the institution retains its mandate.

VERIFICATION MANDATE

Obtain the evidence that can change the view.

Obtain three net resale bids for the financed model and enforceable buyback terms; assess the guarantor under the same stress.

Approval covers only fictional evidence collection and review. It approves no investment, credit, insurance amount or NAV. Roles are simulated, without authentication.

01
Gather independent evidenceResearch
02
Challenge assumptions against evidenceRisk / counter-case · after the preceding step
03
Record the decision to continue or stopLeadership · after the preceding step

Continue into operations.

The four operational cases retain their own assumptions, agents, memory and follow-through. Opening another case does not transfer these figures or approval.

YOUR SCALE. YOUR ASSUMPTIONS.

What is a better way of working worth?

Measure released work, then subtract costs. These values are editable assumptions, not observed client results or a commercial quote.

Released capacity is not payroll savings. Accuracy, rework, adoption and actual costs must be measured in a pilot.

Capacity released / year770 h
Capacity value, year 1 net of costs-€4,950
Recurring net capacity value / year€25,050

(Cases × minutes saved / 60 × adoption) × hourly cost − recurring costs − year-one implementation. Negative results remain visible.

COUNTERFOLD / THE CONNECTED SUITE

From fact to action. Without losing the thread.

Your knowledge. Your operating boundaries.

Locally hosted model, private European environment or expressly authorised service: the choice is tested on your tasks. Facts remain in governed systems. Model adaptation is used only when it delivers measured improvement; your data, examples, logs and versions remain controlled.

Explore control choices

START WITH ONE REAL DOSSIER

Bring the decision.
We will connect the evidence.

One authorised historical case, its owner and a success criterion. That is the starting point for a measurable evaluation.

Arrange a private demonstrationThis demonstration claims no client, partnership or commercial result.